In 2015, five Supreme Court Justices overruled the voices and votes of the majority of Americans by ruling that state bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional. These five justices took it upon themselves to redefine the age-old and God-ordained institution of marriage, which is the basic bedrock of all orderly human society. According to the highest court in our land, God’s definition of marriage had to be changed and the basic bedrock of all orderly human society pulled out from under our society in order to accommodate homosexuals, who claimed the Biblical, traditional, and universal definition of marriage was discriminatory toward them, since it prevented them from marrying. The truth, however, is that it didn’t. Homosexuals had the same right to marry as everyone else. They were all free to enter into a lifetime partnership with a member of the opposite sex for the purpose of procreation. 

The real problem was not that homosexuals couldn’t marry, but that they wanted nothing to do with marriage. Instead, they wanted marriage to be redefined to fit their sexual perversion. They knew once it was, their sexual perversion would be legitimized and legalized, by being enshrined in law. Henceforth, the coercive power of government could be co-opted by homosexuals to coerce all Americans into conformity to their radical agenda, by holding the threat of financially ruinous civil litigation or criminal prosecution over the heads of all who refused to recognize their sexual perversion as a protected civil right. 

This Pandora’s Box, opened by our Supreme Court back in 2015, has unleashed upon our society untold evils. In addition, it set a perilous legal precedent, which obligates the Court, by stare decisis, to either contradict itself or consent in the future to two marriages for bisexuals, multiple marriages for polygamists, and even the marrying of consenting minors to adult pedophiles. In fact, this preposterous 2015 ruling of our Supreme Court legally deems all sexual relationships marriageable and any dissent to any of them criminally discriminatory. Marriage can now be redefined by our courts to its lowest common denominator, so as to be all-inclusive, nondescript, offensive to no one and agreeable to everyone. In other words, marriage can be reduced to meaninglessness and our society to madness. 

Winston Churchill famously said, "Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Yesterday, our Supreme Court proved that it has learned nothing from history. Once again, it is considering redefining the divinely defined to accommodate human deviance. For more than three hours yesterday “the Supremes” argued over whether the Biblical, traditional, and universal definition of a man and a woman should be redefined to accommodate the transgendered. I listened to the whole tortuous Supreme Court hearing, coming away, not only feeling like I had just listened to an episode of The Three Stooges; namely,“Disorder in the Court,” but also convinced that our country’s prospects for the future are about as good as a snowball’s chance in Hell.

For more than three hours yesterday our Supreme Court grappled with no-brainer questions. What is a man? What is a woman? Can a man be a woman? Can a woman be a man? Should biological males be permitted to participate in women’s sports? While any sane person with a thimble full of sense could answer these simple questions in an instant, our country’s supposed greatest legal minds argued over them like they had been asked to define the universe and give three examples. One Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is not only the biggest dingbat to ever don a Supreme Court robe, but who also admitted during her confirmation hearing that she couldn’t define what a woman is, since she is a judge and not a biologist, actually agreed with a lawyer for the transgendered that it is unconstitutional to discriminate against the undefinable. Never mind that there is no way to tell if, how, or when we’re discriminating against something undefinable, such as, in Jackson’s moronic mind, a woman, it’s definitely unconstitutional for us to do so.

This case, over the right of transgendered women, who are biological males, to compete in sports, is like the 2015 same-sex marriage case, in that it too is based on a faulty and false premise. Just as all homosexuals had the same right to marry as everyone else, way back in 2015, today’s transgendered women have the same right to compete in sports as everyone else. However, just as homosexuals didn’t want to enter into a lifetime partnership with a member of the opposite sex for the purpose of procreation, but to redefine the God-ordained institution of marriage to accommodate their human deviance, so now transgendered women don’t want to compete in sports against biological males, but want to redefine the Biblical, traditional, and universal definition of a man and woman, to accommodate their human deviance and to allow them to compete against biological females.

In spite of all of the legalese spewed by our Supreme Court yesterday, as well as the coming avalanche of legalese that the Court will eventually bury their final decision under, none of it can or will hide the horrifying fact that you and I are now living in a society that has gone stark raving mad. You may find some solace in your hope that the majority of Supreme Court Justices will eventually rule that state bans on biological males in women’s sports are not unconstitutional. As far as I’m concerned, however, I find myself completely unsolaceable, since this cockamamie case was not thrown out of our lowest court, made its way all the way up to our highest court, and was then argued over for more than three hours, despite the fact that the case is an inarguable no-brainer.