March 20, 2022 @ 9:00 AM

The PCR test, which was used not only to diagnose cases of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but also to literally shutdown the world, lockdown our society, cripple our economy, and suspend our constitutional rights and freedoms, was never approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Instead, it was only “emergency use authorized.” By the FDA’s own definition, anything it emergency use authorizes is “experimental,” a designation, by the way, which grants it indemnity from legal liability, in the event it proves ineffective or injurious. 


According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the PCR test was not based on an actual viral isolate, an actual specimen of the virus taken from an infected person, which serves as proof positive of the virus’ presence, but on fragments of genomic sequencing, digitally assembled on a computer from a genomic database. Therefore, the PCR test actually tested for computer simulated fragments believed to be part of the virus, not for the actual virus itself; that is, for its viral isolate or pathognomonic sign, neither of which were available to the developers of the PCR test.


It is important that we pause here to point out a most pertinent fact; namely, no one was actually tested for the virus itself with a PCR test. Instead, they were only tested for the presence of fragments believed to be produced by the virus. Furthermore, since some of these fragments were similar to those produced by influenza, the PCR test could not differentiate between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza.


Did you know that the federal government gave funding to hospitals for each positive PCR test? Consequently, hospitals stopped testing for influenza and mandated PCR testing. Is there any wonder, therefore, that the number of influenza cases in America has mysteriously dropped over the past two years from around 30 million annually to a mere 3,000?  


In 2019, the Chinese informed the World Health Organization (WHO) of the outbreak of a new and novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Afterward, an article, which became known as the Corman-Drosten Paper, was published online in the magazine Eurosurveillance. The article, entitled, Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by realtime RT-PCR, claimed to have come up with a reliable method of detecting the new and novel virus; namely, the PCR test. The authors of the Corman-Drosten Paper, like the CDC, in its emergency use authorization of the PCR test, admitted that they used a theoretical virus sequence for all their work and calculations, since no viral isolate nor pathognomonic sign was available. 


Although the Corman-Drosten Paper was not peered reviewed—evaluated by other independent scientists—and several of its collaborators were found to have serious conflicts of interest, including the authors Corman and Drosten themselves, who failed to divulge their lucrative work for a pharmaceutical company in Germany testing for the new and novel virus, the article was unquestionably accepted and the PCR test it promoted universally adopted as the standard diagnostic tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2. The WHO, CDC, FDA, scientists from around the world, and almost every country’s minister of health immediately began calling for the masses to be PCR tested for the virus. Even if you were asymptomatic, you were told you needed to be tested.


To diagnose someone with influenza, they must have flu-like symptoms, as well as test positive for the identifiable flu pathogen, which cannot possibly be diagnosed as another pathogen with similar symptoms. However, all it took to diagnose anyone, even the totally asymptomatic, with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, was a positive PCR test, regardless of the fact that the experimental test could neither detect the virus’ actual identifiable pathogen nor differentiate between it and influenza. 


“PCR” is an abbreviation for “polymerase chain reaction,” which is a chemical reaction used by molecular scientists to amplify pieces of DNA for study. The PCR method’s inventor, Berkeley scientist, Kary Mullis, warned that the method, for which he won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, was not intended to be used as a diagnostic test for a virus, since it could be easily abused and the results either unintentionally or deliberately misrepresented. 


In addition to the above, it was clearly stated in the guidebook to the PCR test, that the test was not to be cycled or amplified more than 20 to 30 times. For instance, Dr. Anthony Fauci himself admitted that dialing up the magnification of the test over 25 times would result in a fraudulent and deceptive diagnoses. Despite all of this, the PCR test was amplified or magnified 40 times, which inevitably, as Anthony Fauci himself admitted, resulted in fraudulent and deceptive test results.


The justification for the over-amplification of the PCR test was to make the test highly sensitive to the slightest trace of the least little fragment of the virus. After all, it was argued, the virus could never be controlled unless every case was being diagnosed and none were allowed to slip through the cracks undetected. As a result of the over-amplification of the test, millions of asymptomatic people, people who were neither sick nor suffering, tested positive for the virus. Of course, this created quite a dilemma, either the PCR test had to be shelved as flawed or the flawed test had to be sold by suggesting that the virus was lethal to some, but totally benign to others. The latter argument was adopted, in order to prevent the public from losing faith in the PCR test. 


With the experimental, unproven, unsuited, and over-amplified PCR test serving as the basis for reported SARS-CoV-2 cases and COVID-19 fatalities, a group of twenty-two independent scientists and researchers came together to peer review the Corman-Drosten Paper, which established the PCR test as the universally adopted standard diagnostic tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2. Their findings were, to say the least, most disconcerting. Not only did they find that the paper had 10 major scientific flaws, and should therefore be immediately retracted, but they also found that the PCR test had such enormous potential for producing false positives that it should be both discredited and discarded as “useless.”


It is now an incontrovertible fact that the PCR test was indubitably prone to produce false positives. Some estimates have the percentage of false positives from the PCR test in some areas as high as 90%. To give you some idea of the gargantuan discrepancy and great exaggeration of SARS-CoV-2 cases this generated, consider the following illustration. According to Public Health England, there were 145,129 new cases of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosed by tests during the week of November 9th 2020. During that same week, however, there were only 87 cases diagnosed by doctors. Needless to say, the PCR test’s plethora of false positives grossly exaggerated the number of SARS-CoV-2 cases, as well as fanned the flames of public panic over the supposed planetary spread of a pandemic like a wildfire.


Adding insult to injury, the PCR test was also found to be inaccurate in detecting variants of the virus, such as the Delta and Omicron variants. Whereas it was already proven flawed by the multitude of its false positives, it was further proven flawed by its false negatives. In other words, it was not only detecting the virus in people who were uninfected, but it was also failing to detect the virus in people who were infected. Obviously, by this point. the PCR test was proven, as its independent peer reviewers had found, to be “useless.”


On July 21, 2021, the CDC announced that the FDA’s emergency use authorization of the PCR test was to be pulled and the test itself taken off the market by the end of the year. It was a striking admission of the utter unreliability of the PCR test that had been used to shutdown our world, lockdown our society, cripple our economy, and suspend our constitutional rights and freedoms. There may very well have been an additional, not to mention ulterior motive, for the CDC’s shelving of the PCR test, since the continuing plethora of its false positives would have tended to undermine public confidence in the efficacy of mandated vaccines in a majority vaccinated population. Therefore, needing to sell the efficacy of the vaccines more than to further scare the public over the spread of the virus, the CDC decided to shelve the PCR test, with its plethora of false positives, in order to persuade the public that the pandemic, thanks to the vaccines, was becoming a mere epidemic.


However you look at it, the PCR test failed the test and was proven in the end to be totally unreliable and practically useless, except in furthering a narrative used by our government to seize emergency powers and to usurp control over our lives.