The most tyrannical states in the world during the COVID “PANICdemic” were China, New Zealand, and Australia. Although the three are very different in many ways, they all have one glaring similarity; namely, unarmed populaces. As George Mason, one of our Founding Fathers, warned, “To disarm the people is the best way to enslave them.” Unbeknownst to most Americans today, the Second Amendment to our Constitution was primarily intended by our Founding Fathers to assure us of protection against our own government, if and when it should ever become tyrannical and seek to revoke our God-given, inalienable, and constitutional rights. For instance, Noah Webster argued that before our government could rule us it must first disarm us and Thomas Jefferson argued that unless we take up arms and possess a spirit of resistance we cannot preserve our liberties nor protect ourselves against a future tyrannous government.

Last night, in an address to our nation, President Joe Biden, in response to the tragic school shooting in Uvalde, Texas,  announced to all Americans that the Second Amendment is not absolute. Furthermore, Biden called for gun control legislation, which will restrict access to guns, under the guise that it will not infringe on anyone’s rights, but merely protect children, families, and whole communities, preventing us from being shot and killed when we go to school, church, or the grocery store.

Although it is totally illogical, loony liberals, like Joe Biden, always argue for the disarming of sane and law-abiding Americas every time some insane lawbreaker perpetrates a mass shooting. Take for example Biden’s idiotic demand that the Second Amendment be revoked over the tragic school shooting in Uvalde. Far from providing a sensible argument against the Second Amendment, this tragedy actually provides a sound argument for it. After all, what better argument is there that we don’t need to wait for police protection, but need the right to bear arms for our own protection, than Uvalde?

As it is often quipped, “When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.” Still, the beat goes on and America’s gun grabbers keep calling for the disarming of America under the ridiculous ruse that it will rid America of all gun violence. Yet, as statistics prove, cities with the strictest gun laws, like Chicago and New York, don’t have less gun violence, but much more than cities with more lenient gun laws. Obviously, when one looks at this issue factually it flies in the face of the facts and forces one to conclude that it is a mere cloak meant to conceal some hidden, and I might add, hellish objective; namely, the disarming of America.

This past Monday, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who is increasingly mistaking himself for an all-powerful potentate, announced, in reaction to the Uvalde school shooting, that “it will no longer be possible to buy, sell, transfer or import handguns anywhere in Canada.” According to Canada’s self-proclaimed Czar, Canucks no longer need guns, despite the fact that under Trudeau’s tyrannous reign pastors have been arrested by heavily-armed swat teams for holding church services and an elderly motorist was wrestled to the ground, cuffed, and arrested for honking his horn in Ottawa. If you ask me, our Founding Fathers would not only beg to differ with Canada’s Trudeau, but would also warn the Canadian people that they need guns now more than ever, mainly to protect themselves against their own government.

Yesterday, in an emergency meeting of the House Judiciary Committee, which was convened in response to the Uvalde school shooting, Democrats penned an extensive gun control package, craftily called by them, “Protecting Our Kids Act.” Now, who could possibly be against “protecting our kids,” except coldhearted conservatives, who abortion-advocating Democrats have accused for years of failing to safeguard children by refusing to suspend the Second Amendment? What Democrats are actually proposing and our president promoting, however, under the pretense of protecting children, is the initial and incremental steps toward the revocation of the Second Amendment. As history plainly proves, once initial and incremental steps are taken to encroach upon our fundamental rights by an intrusive government, there is no stopping the government until it becomes autocratic and our fundamental rights are abrogated. Therefore, make no mistake about what is really going on in today’s America. Your government is gunning for your guns so that it can put you under the gun of its autocratic rule. 

It was the Chinese communist dictator, not to mention one of the world’s greatest mass murderers, Mao Tse Tung, who famously said, “Political power grows from the barrel of a gun.” The key, however, is that guns must first become the exclusive possession of those in power. As long as the people, as well as those in power, have guns, there’s a standoff, since both are staring down the barrel of a gun. However, when the government alone has guns, the people alone are staring down the barrel of a gun, and will suddenly find themselves right where a tyrannical government wants them, over a barrel.