The Bible teaches us that men do not deny the truth about God because of science or scholarship, but because of sin (Romans 1:18). They refuse to acknowledge the reality of God, because if they ever do, they will have to face the fact of their accountability to God, which they are unwilling to do. Still, as the Apostle Paul exclaims in Romans 1:18-23, anyone who denies the existence of an intelligent Creator, while surrounded by the incontrovertible evidence of an intricately designed creation, is an inexcusable imbecile, certainly not an intelligent intellectual. 

Years ago, in an interview with Ben Stein, for Stein's documentary film, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, renowned scientist and atheist Richard Dawkins, proved his denial of God's existence to be the product of a black heart, not a brilliant mind. During the interview, Dawkins, the author of the book, The God Delusion, claimed to be 99 percent certain that there is no God. However, when pressed by Stein on the 1 percent possibility he leaves open for God’s existence, an irritated Dawkins recoiled, insisting that even if Intelligent Design is ever proven it will not prove the existence of God, but of a highly evolved extraterrestrial who came to earth and seeded life on our planet.

Dawkins’ willingness to believe in the possibility of little green men from Mars, coupled with his unwillingness to believe in the God-man from Heaven, is proof positive of all that Paul wrote in the first chapter of Romans. It’s not the genius of Dawkins’ brilliant mind that causes him to reject Jesus Christ; instead, it’s the darkness of a heart at enmity with God. This alone explains why this so-called brilliant scientist vows that no matter what scientific evidence ever says he’ll never say that Jesus is Lord. Unfortunately for Dawkins, he’ll be as unable to carry out this vow as he is to prove that creation has no Creator (Philippians 2:9-11). 

The reason for my reminiscing today about Dawkins' pledge to use his "Martian" argument against God's existence, when real science inevitably disproves Dawkins' atheism, is because Ketanji Brown Jackson just used the "Martian" argument against our Constitution and two centuries of legal precedent, in order to defend her unconstitutional defense of universal injunctions and an imperial judiciary. As I recently wrote, nobody can take this silly clown as a serious Supreme Court Justice, since she demands that the highest court in our land disregard our own laws and Constitution, in order to do what she herself personally demands. Rather than being perched on the bench of our highest court, Jackson should be immediately impeached, lest her tribe increase and our Supreme Court become an imperial one and our country no longer a land ruled by law, but by lawyers, like Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Despite Jackson's ridiculous argument in favor of crowning distinct court judges as our emperors, being called “untethered” and found unworthy of any serious consideration by Jackson's fellow Supreme Court Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, we've now learned that Jackson's looniness actually sunk to lower levels of silliness. She actually argued, while completely ignoring our Constitution herself, that a "Martian arriving here from another planet" would ask "what good is [our] Constitution," unless distinct court judges are enabled, as she believes they should be, to seize the executive powers of a "power-hungry" president, like Donald Trump. Never mind that a Martian would be from Mars, not any other planet, something any grade schooler would know, Jackson's idiocy and incompetence as a Supreme Court Jurist is proven by her resorting to science fiction to support her looney legal argument in favor of judicial despotism. If I too might resort to science fiction, I'd say that Captain Kirk would call upon Scotty to beam him back up to the Starship Enterprise from a planet allowing a Ketanji Brown Jackson to sit on the Supreme Court of its most powerful nation, since the good captain would be forced to conclude that there was no intelligent life upon such a planet.

JUSTICE JACKSON IS EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT