Exposing the Gay Agenda
9 Dec 2005
Last February, Judge Doris Ling-Cohan took it upon herself to declare the state of New York’s domestic relations law unconstitutional. According to her, the law was unconstitutional because it failed to make allowances for same-sex marriages. Ruling in favor of five gay couples who sued the city of New York over the city clerk’s refusal to accept their applications for marriage licenses, Judge Ling-Cohan, with a single swing of her gavel, barred the city clerk from denying marriage licenses to gay couples and redefined the licenses’ terms “husband,” “wife,” “groom,” and “bride” to be equally applicable to men and women.
Yesterday, the state of New York’s Supreme Court’s Appellate Division overruled Judge Ling-Cohan’s February decision, ruling that she not only erred, but also grossly overstepped her authority. According to the appellate court, it is not the role of judges to redefine terms, such as “husband” and “wife,” that are given clear meaning in a statute. When a judge does so they exceed their “constitutional mandate” and usurp “that of the Legislature.” The appeals court added that more disconcerting to them than Judge Ling-Cohan’s exceeding of her role as a judge was her rewriting of the law and creating of a “new constitutional right”—the right of gays to marry.
What a breath of fresh air, a sane ruling from a U.S. Appellate Court. Not only did the New York Supreme Court’s Appellate Division reign in an out of control judicial activist—Judge Doris Ling-Cohan—but it also exposed the gay rights agenda. Gays don’t want to marry; they want to redefine marriage. Gays already have the same right to marry as everyone else; however, they want nothing to do with marriage. Instead, they want to redefine marriage to fit their perversion. If successful, they will destroy marriage as we know it and pull from beneath our society the one God ordained bedrock of all orderly societies.
Don Walton
|
