Homosexuality & Pedophilia
2 Oct 2006
Friday’s resignation from Congress by Republican Mark Foley serves as the latest example in a steady stream of incidents in which the linkage between homosexuality and pedophilia is intentionally concealed. According to the media, Foley’s resignation was precipitated by “inappropriate e-mails” the congressman sent to congressional pages. Anyone who gets their news from the mainstream media is probably thinking that Foley’s fall from grace was caused by such things as an e-mailed commendation of a young teen’s physique. The truth, however, is far more sinister. Foley was sending homosexually explicit e-mails to teenage boys, e-mails so filthy and offensive that I dare not repeat them here.
Do you remember how the mainstream media reported every sorted detail of President Clinton’s sexual escapades with Monica Lewinsky? No sorted detail was overlooked or unreported. Yet, when sexual scandals are homosexual rather than heterosexual, the mainstream media hushes itself with a self-imposed gag rule. For instance, while it aggressively reported on pedophile priests in the Catholic Church, the mainstream media failed to emphasize the fact that the vast majority of these priests were homosexuals—Catholic clerics sexually abusing little boys. While it gladly obscures the obvious connections between homosexuality and pedophilia, today’s media unmercifully condemns organizations like the Boy Scouts of America, an organization that refuses to allow homosexuals to take little boys out into the woods for weekend campouts.
In view of the facts that Congressman Foley has served as the Deputy Majority Whip in the House, as the co-chair of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children, and is on record as denouncing sex predators as “animals,” one would think that Democrats, with their eye on the upcoming midterm elections, would be quick to pull the trigger and fire at Republicans all of the new ammunition that the Foley fiasco has provided them. However, Democrats are thus far acting somewhat subdued in their response to this Republican scandal. Why, one cannot help but wonder, are Democrats not giddily slashing Republican jugulars and jumping up and down on Republican throats. Could it be fear that a ruthless attack on the fallen Foley would produce a political backlash against Democrats by their gay supporters?
If Foley was merely a conservative Republican, then Democrats would undoubtedly declare open season on him. The feeding frenzy would have already commenced and the political pool would be red with Republican blood. The only reason Democratic fangs are not showing and Republican blood is not flowing is the fact that Foley is no mere Republican. He is also a homosexual; and when it comes to homosexuality, today’s gay community insists that no one sees, hears, or speaks any evil against it.
Don Walton
|
